Beta release. We are still refining and welcome feedback.

DPW000033470

Assess Existing Tree or Stump

How we assembled this data →

CompletedClosed January 28, 2021
Requested
August 13, 2019
Subtype
Standard Tree Maintenance
Location
3314 N St
As reported by the submitter and published by the City. May be the submitter’s address or another party’s; the City does not anonymize to block level.
Council District
7
Neighborhood
Chimborazo

Description

Report of hazardous tree half on private property.

Details

Street Blocked?
No
Sidewalk Blocked?
No

History

  1. August 13, 2019
    The service request is submitted.
  2. August 13, 2019
    The service request status has been changed to Assigned to Department.
  3. January 28, 2021
    The service request status has been changed to Completed.

Comments

  • Staff · August 13, 2019
    Cityworks ID: 402373
  • Staff · August 13, 2019
    An email I sent 8/12/2019 Thank you! The municipal tree policy that’s posted on the city’s website clearly states under Section 5A, Easements Dedicated and Unimproved Streets the following: “It shallbe the responsibility of the property owner to maintain easement trees. The tree at the above address falls into this category. The city does not maintain alley/ easement trees. Today, I left a door hanger at 3314 N St with my phone number andI have not heard a response. Do you have the residents contact information? I’m happy to communicate the ordinance to the resident if need be. Thanks!
  • Staff · November 12, 2019
    Tree Removed 08/01/2019 S1 29'' Tree ID 5454
  • Staff · January 28, 2020
    Citizen, Mr. Randall Walter called 804-699-0000 stating that a tree behind his house is a City tree and he should not be responsible to take it down. He stated it has been confirmed by code enforcement Charlie Rose that the tree is a City Tree. He would like to meet with the Arborist along with Mr. Charlie Rose to discuss the tree.
  • Staff · January 29, 2020
    Operations manager John Chupek and Arborist Michael Staton met with the resident today and explained the land survey placed this tree on private property.

Spotted a problem with this record?