Beta release. We are still refining and welcome feedback.

DPU000013002

Assess Standing Water

How we assembled this data →

CompletedClosed February 22, 2021
Requested
February 22, 2021
Subtype
Assess Stormwater
Location
2521 Bells Road, 23234
As reported by the submitter and published by the City. May be the submitter’s address or another party’s; the City does not anonymize to block level.
Council District
8
Neighborhood
Jeff Davis

Description

Storm water from Tuffy Auto Service Center 3621 JD Highway continuously runs off into our property causing excessive pooling, soil saturation, erosion and potential damage. Asking City of Richmond to install a drainage system to alleviate the problem

Details

Problem area
Street
Is there standing water?
Yes
Is the problem in the rear of the property?
Yes
Is the problem in the front of the property?
Yes
Is the problem on the side of the property?
Yes
Is there a erosion issue?
Yes
Is the problem in the creek or stream?
No
Is this related to vegetation?
No

History

  1. February 22, 2021
    The service request is submitted.
  2. February 22, 2021
    The service request status has been changed to Assigned to Department.
  3. February 22, 2021
    The service request status has been changed to Completed.

Comments

  • Staff · February 22, 2021
    Cityworks ID: 438287
  • Staff · February 22, 2021
    The complaint does not involve any public right of way drainage or displacement of such on the property. This issue really is a civil matter for the two property owners to address if any actions are taken at all. The image below illustrates a brief rendering of the two properties and the elevations of the lots/parcel. The Commercial property (Tuffy’s Muffler) rear property is approximately 1-3 ft higher than the property of the Melson’s property of 2521 Bells road. Based on the land topography it’s expected that runoff and sheet flows would drain to lower portions of the property and along the property lines of Melson’s property. There are no violations here which would require City involvement.The commercial property has not changed anything nor are they directing any flows to the property. The lay of the land is dictating what happens here. This is not a City issue as this is all private property.

Spotted a problem with this record?